The Findability blog

the enterprise search and findability blog by Findwise

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • About
  • Findwise.com

Tag Archives: search patterns

Structured and actionable search results – there is more to presentation than blue links

Posted on June 22, 2010 by Lina Westerling
Reply

Search patterns are standardized patterns describing search functionality as well as human information seeking behavior. Earlier this year Peter Morville and Jeffery Callender released a book about search patterns.  Morville also gave a presentation based on the book at the IA Summit 2010 (slides, mp3), which my colleague Maria and I attended. Among the patterns Peter Morville mentions, my favorite ones are structured and actionable search results.

Structured search results

Let us start with structured search results. You might have seen that for certain queries you submit on Google, you get a richer results presentation than for other results. For example, typing the query ‘weather stockholm’ gives a basic weather forecast for the upcoming four days, directly visible in the results list. Other examples include local movie showtimes and stock information. It is even possible to use google as a calculator or a currency converter by typing in certain kinds of searches. For the curious, here is a list of all google.com search features. Structured results is about offering a more informative presentation of search results than just a title, summary, and possibly some basic metadata. It is also about not presenting all information in the same way, because the information in itself differs. Richer results presentations speeds up the process of finding relevant information since the system has already done some pre-processing for user.

Google structured results

Structured metadata is a prerequisite for structured search results presentation. Web pages and documents normally come with standard metadata such as date and author, but in some cases they will have to be augmented with additional information in order to create a more useful presentation. Presenting results in a custom way requires some extra development effort, especially if the structure is not initially available. However, I believe it creates much value to the user. Also, this need not be done for all types of contents. My advice would be to identify the cases where a more elaborate results presentation would be most usable. Which information is frequently requested by many people and perhaps also difficult to find because it is embedded in pages with lots of text or other contents? Search logs and user feedback in combination with thorough knowledge about the contents provides a key basis for the selection.

Actionable search results

Related to structured results are actionable search results. Entries in the search results list can be more than just displays of information; they can also be means of performing tasks. Common examples found on the web include printing, saving or sharing the search result directly from the results list. Other examples include adding to shopping cart, commenting and rating. Within the enterprise or organization additional relevant actions could perhaps be checking in or out a document, add an event to the personal calendar, starting a chat with a co-worker, and so on. As with structured results, it is about identifying the cases where it would add most value. What are the most common tasks and possibly also what tasks are complicated to perform in the source system? Structured and actionable results share the advantage that users do not have to open the actual results web page or download the document to find or do what they need. Speeding up information seeking and other tasks in this way is not only valuable in web search, it can also be very useful within the enterprise or organization. Search results lists in enterprise search solutions still look quite homogeneous and there are lots of opportunities for improvement.

To conclude, there can and should be more to search results presentation than just a snippet. I believe we will benefit from putting focus on the results presentation, and not only on tools surrounding it (filtering for example). After all, the list of results is where the user’s attention is first drawn. What do you think? How can your organization benefit from working with structured and actionable search results? If you are curious about this approach, we would be happy to help you look into what can be done in your organization.

Posted in Findability, Interaction Design, Internet search, Intranet, Search, Search Watch, Usability, User Experience | Tagged actionable search results, and so on, author, Bing, co-worker, Enterprise Search, enterprise search solutions, Google, http, Information retrieval, internet search engines, Jeffery Callender, Maria, Metadata, patterns describing search functionality, Peter Morville, pre-processing, printing, search logs, search patterns, search result, Searching, structured and actionable search results, web search, Web search engine | Leave a reply

Designing for Search at Business to Buttons

Posted on June 8, 2008 by Maria Johansson
Reply

I read an interesting interview where Peter Morville interviewed Luke Wroblewski about Search Patterns. They mentioned some search patterns.

Query Refinement

Most users won’t refine pre-query. They don’t know the size and range of the index. But they will refine post-query, and it provides tremendous value.

Search Assistance

Studies show a correlation between the number of words in the query and satisfaction with results. Search Assist improves query richness. Tips (e.g., did you mean?) improve confidence and suggestions (e.g., related concepts) can shift users into exploratory mode.

Layout

For query refinement tools, we found the right rail is the least discoverable. The top is the most obvious, but suggestions can get in the way of results. That’s why search assist is on top but hidden by default. Other examples include Local and Shopping.

Vertical Search

In verticals such as News and Games, we’ve found that people are fine with two search boxes, one for the vertical and one for web search. In each vertical, we’re selectively exposing structured metadata (e.g., pricing in Autos) to support the decision making process.

It’s always nice when other companies corroborate our findings and experiences.

If you want to know more about these topics and about designing good search experiences come and listen to us talk at Business to Buttons in Malmö. There will be something for the expert as well as those new to search technology. You can also come and talk to us in our monter during the breaks. Hope to see you there!

Posted in Interaction Design, Search Watch, Usability | Tagged Index, Information retrieval, internet search, internet search engines, Luke Wroblewski, Metadata, Person Communication and Meetings, Peter Morville, query refinement tools, search boxes, search experiences, search patterns, Searching, Vertical search, web search | Leave a reply

Recent Posts

  • Semantic Annotation (how to make stuff findable, and more)
  • Building a chatbot – that actually works
  • Design Elements of Search – Zero Results Page
  • Design Elements of Search – Landing Page
  • Design Elements of Search – Results

Recent Comments

  • Fredric Landqvist on Tinkering with knowledge graphs
  • Harold Solbrig on Tinkering with knowledge graphs
  • Reflection, part 2 on Reflection… is like violence
  • Łukasz Wójcik on 3 easy ways to integrate external data sources with SharePoint Online
  • Gavin on 3 easy ways to integrate external data sources with SharePoint Online

Tags

Apache Software Foundation Apache Solr business intelligence content management systems Document Management System Enterprise Search Facebook findability Findwise Google Google Search Appliance Human-computer interaction IBM Index Information Information retrieval Information science internet search engines Intranet Knowledge representation Kristian Norling Lucene M&A Metadata Microsoft Microsoft SharePoint search analytics search engine search engines search experience Searching search platform search result search results search solution search solutions search technology SharePoint Social information processing Technical communication usability Web 2.0 web design Web search engine World Wide Web
Find us on Google+

Categories

Archives

Proudly powered by WordPress